Petras Hieroglyphic
Documents
a web edition with commentary
inaugural date: 2 January 2005; last
update:14
August 2010
Comments,
corrections, questions: John
Younger
(jyounger@ku.edu)
Back to the
Homepage
Notes
For best viewing results, widen this webfile to
at least 25 cm.
In the commentary (not in the headings), CHIC documents
(numbers
preceded by #) in bold (e.g.,
#225) are sealstones
or impressions.
In the "normalizations"
(phonetic readings) suggested below, the
phonetic identifications of the
Hiero signs are based on Notes on the Signs,
a separate study
of the individual signs, their resemblances to Linear
A/B signs and the
patterns of their use in Hiero. The phonetic values of
signs in
black are considered certain; those in
red are considered probable; and those in
green are considered possible. With
green values, sometimes only the consonant
is
guessed
and the syllable is then rendered as in the following Kv.
A raised asterisk after the syllabogram
indicates the reading is doubtful
(e.g., 
*),
similarly for the underlined
transnumeration and normalization (e.g.,
042
A).
Petras
Tsipopoulou, M., and E. Hallager (with contributions by C. D.
Annibale
and D. Mylona). 2010. Hieroglyphic Archive at Petras, Siteias.
Athens: The Danish Institute at Athens.
Tsipopoulou, M., and E. Hallager. 1996a. "Inscriptions with
Hieroglyphs and Linear A from Petras, Siteia," SMEA 37: 7-46, esp.
39-42.
Tsipopoulou, M., and E. Hallager. 1996b. "A New Hieroglyphic Archive
from Petras, Siteia," Kadmos 35: 164-67.
Tsipopoulou, M. 1998. "The Hieroglyphic Archive from the Palatial
Building at Petras," AJA 102; 391.
He 1 medallion comes from the Magazine Corridor (LM IB destruction
context?).
An amphora impressed with a Hieroglyphic seal comes from House 1, room
Φ: CMS V Suppl. 1B, no. 329 (see HieroSealsImps.html)
The rest of the documents come from the Hieroglyphic deposit, which
fell during a conflagration in MM IIB from an upper room onto a hard
yellow clay floor laid over the monumental N. doorway. The deposit
consists of
crescents Ha 003-5
roundel Hc 002
medallions He 006-015
bars Hh 016, 017
sealstone impressions 01-06 of hieroglyphic sealstones
many sealings impressed by non-hieroglyphic sealstones
many fragments of once-inscribed texts
For crescents, the following denote the sides:
&alpha: the part of the surface which carries the seal impression(s) -
usually found on top of the crescent.
&beta: the "concave" side of the crescent
&gamma: the flat reverse of the crescent
&delta: the "convex" side of the crescent
Palaeography & Pinacology (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 168-177)
There were at least 3 scribes at work on documents from the
Hieroglyphic Deposit:
bars Hh 016 and 017 were written by two different people
crescent Ha 003 was written by a person different from that who
produced bar Hh 016 and medallion He 001
bar Hh 016 was written by a person different from those who produced
medallion He 011, medallion He 006, and medallion He 007
Since 4 documents (Hh 017, He 006, 007, and 008) are made of soft fine
yellow clay and were inscribed by a very fine, well-pointed stylus, they
may have been written by the same scribe.
Sign 042 is consistenly written with an
incurved top and bottom line, like glyptic versions of the double-ax sign
-- and like the sign on MA/Y Yb 01.
Vocabulary (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 176-77)
"None of the sign-groups found on the Petras documents have previously
been attested in the corpus of hieroglyphic inscriptions. For this reason
there is no comparative material."
JGY suggests possible comparanda below.
PE Ha 003, crescent (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 84 & 155-56).
On top (α), an impression from a single seal.
D. 3.7 x 1.6. Th. 1.15.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| α | PE 001 (palmette) | |
| β |    | 039-070-068
|
| γ |   | 042-023-011 |
| δ | • *• | •-031-039-• |
Possibly the preliminary document to the totalling document Hh 016.
β (p. 177). cf. PE Hh 016.b1: 
50 039-070-086
γ. JGY: cf. PE He 001.A-B: X 
+• 042-033-011 040+•
δ. JGY: the space at end is insufficient for a fourth sign, and
a four-sign wordgroup is itself not common.
JGY: If read consistent with the direction implied on γ,
starting at the "left" end with 042, I normalize
the direction of the readings as below, reading opposite sides together,
α+γ then β+δ.
JGY normalizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| α | PE 001: palmette | |
|
| γ | | 042-023-011 | A-TU-SI |
| β |
<> | 068-070-039 <> | Rv-RO3-PA3 |
| δ | *• <> | 031-039-•
<> | RE-PA3-• |
PE Ha 004, crescent (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 84 & 155-56).
D. 2.05 x 1.7. Th. 1.13.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| α | deest | deest |
| β | deest | deest |
| γ |  • | 034-• |
| δ | deest | deest |
γ: 
034-054
possible. JGY: 
034-056
TA-KU appears on KN #049.c1 and #061.d2.
PE Ha 005, crescent (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 86 & 155-56).
D. 3.02 x [1.37]. Th. [1.15].
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| α | deest | deest |
| β | not visible/preserved, possibly vacat |
not visible/preserved, possibly vacat |
| γ | not visible/preserved, possibly vacat
| not visible/preserved, possibly vacat |
| δ | deest | deest |
"Since [no inscription or seal impression] can be seen, Ha 005 must
probably be a crescent which was in the process of being prepared but had
not yet been inscribed or given seal impression(s)."
PE Hc 002, roundel (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 80 & 157).
This (and possibly ME 96/0444A, fragment) is the first roundel in a
hieroglyphic context.
D. 2.73 x 2.48. Th. 1.0.
| side | inscription |
| a | sigillum, supra sigillum 1
|
| b | vacat |
sigillum PE 021 (discoid? seal: curved stroke with dot in front,
faint strokes. Pres. D. 1.1)
PE He 001 -- Medallion from E-W corridor of the N. magazines
[LM IB destruction context?], just south of the eastern-most ashlar block
[just outside and east of the entrance to Magazine 2, the second from the
west] (M. Tsipopoulou and E. Hallager, "Inscriptions with Hieroglyphs and
Linear A from Petras, Siteia," SMEA 37 (1996) 7-46, esp. 39-42)
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | X | X
042-033-011 |
| b | +[•]
703 | 040+[•] 703 |
Comments
a: JGY: a heading; cf. PE Ha
003.c: 042-023-011. In the Notes to Sign 033, I suggest
that it (besides being a predecessor to A*47) represents a voiced dental
(Tv, Dv); if so, then
042-033 could join the list of other occurrences of A-TU at Petras
(see note to PE Hh 016), with the alternative possibility of being a
spelling variation on the more common A-DE heading in Hieroglyphic
(cf. A-DU in Linear A).
b: The ligatured sign looks
like 042 as it sometimes appears as a mason's
mark.
b: JGY: The ligatured sign 
looks
like an abbreviated 039 or an abbreviated and
haftless 042. As a ligature, it resembles
Linear A 
*566 (086+188) or 
*565 (086+'188'). *566 employs
the standard form of 
188 and occurs
only by
itself on KH roundels (Wc 2058-62). *565 employs a square version of 188
and occurs
on HT 8b.5, a commodity that is measured in a fraction (J, 1/2) and
presumably is disbursed to PA-JA-RE, and on HT 26b.4 (7 units
contributed?).
JGY: It is
remotely possible that the ligatured sign is Petras's way of writing <--
057-040
KI-RO2 (also retrograde on MA #118b).
For the number 703, cf. PE
Hh 017.a 740.
JGY normalizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a-b | X +[•] 703 | X
042-033-011 040+[•]
703 | A-/TvDv/-SI
RO2+[•] |
| OR | | |
| a-b | X 703 | X
042-033-011 A*566
703 | A-/TvDv/-SI
RO2+[•] |
Compare
a: if something like
A-/TvDv/-SI, cf. Linear A: A-DU (common)
b: ?? <--- KI+RO2 ??
PE He 006, medallion fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 74
& 158-61).
D. 3.70 x 3.39. Th. 1.25.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | * | 042-023-049 |
| b | vacat | vacat |
a: 023 is probable but not certain.
JGY: A-TU,
see the note to Hh 016. For 023, 031 might be preferred; see PE He 007.
JGY normalizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a | * | 042-023
*049 | A-TU RO3 |
| OR | |
| a | * | 042-023
*174 | A-TU RE |
PE He 007, medallion fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 74-75 &
158-61).
D. 3.64 x [2.42]. Th. 0.84.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | X | X 056-031 |
| b | 30[ | 30[ |
a: X 
038-031
possible (see KN #033.a, #044.a, #056.dA, #057.c, #069.v)
JGY: 056-031 is
probably correct KU-RE meaning "paid" vel sim. (cf.
KN #032.a1)
JGY: for the number 30, see
He 010, He
011, Hh 016.d
JGY normalizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a-b | X 30[ | 056-031
30[ | KU-RE 30[ |
PE He 008, medallion (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 75 &
158-61).
D. [2.05 x 1.49]. Th. 0.62.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | vest. | vest. |
| b | vacat | vacat |
PE He 009, medallion fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
75-76 & 158-61).
D. 3.75 x 4.02. Th. 1.11.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | X • * * | X
•-072-019-070 |
| b | 20 | 20 |
a: [•] resembles an animal head, perhaps 018. 072 not
absolutely certain.
a: JGY: cf.
019-070 NEW PYR Yb 1; 
019-070-061 on #040.a1. Sign
072 usually is part of a transaction term
(KA-PA3, KA-RO3) or modifies TELA (as Linear
A KU does).
b: JGY: for the number, see He 012, 014; Hh 016.a2 + d
JGY normalizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a-b | X •* * 20 | X
•-072 019-070
20 | •-KA SA-RO
20 |
PE He 010, medallion (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 76 &
158-61).
D. 3.60 x [3.49]. Th. 1.01.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | ••• | ••• |
| b | 30 | 30 |
a: the first sign may be 042. JGY: if so, the
statement is probably a heading -•-•
30 (cf. Ha 003.c, He 001). For the number 30, see He 007, He
011, Hh 016.d.
PE He 011, medallion fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 77
& 158-61).
D. 3.05 x [2.16]. Th. 0.68.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | * • | 061-013-• |
| b | 30 | 30 |
a: 061 could be 023 ; • cannot be 042, perhaps a sign similar to A *305 (cf. HT 9b.2)
or an unusual variant of 034 .
JGY: for the first sign, 023 is more likely;
cf. the similarly
crisp zig-zag on Ha 003 and Hh 016a; if this were 061, it would be hapax beginning a word, whereas 061
is a common ending in the rest of the Hiero inscriptions. The parallels
make it likely that 013 is BOS *152 -- see
Notes to Sign 013 for the possibility that 013, as
the median sign of a
trisyllabic signgroup, needs to be separated out, creating a disyllabic
transaction word plus logogram.
Since A-TU
occurs several times in the PE corpus (see note to Hh 016), and since 042 is possible here, I restore it.
JGY: for the number 30, see He
007, He 010, Hh 016.d
JGY normalizes and hypothesizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a-b | ]
30 | 042-]023 *152
30 | A-]TU
BOS 30 |
PE He 012, medallion fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
77-78 & 158-61).
D. 3.25 x [2.22]. Th. 0.58.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | • • | •-025-• |
| b | 20[ | 20[ |
a: the first sign may be 072. The last sign
may be one of the animal heads 011-016.
b: 20 is a minimum.
JGY: in Hallager's palaeography section (p. 173), he suggests this
occurrence to 072; another possibility for the last sign is 
005, although the dotted eyelashes are missing; cf.
Hh 016.d: 20 025-056-005 20.
JGY: for the number, cf. He 009, 014; Hh 016.a2.
JGY normalizes and hypothesizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a-b |
20[ | 072-005 *025
20[ | KA-Rv TE
20[ |
| OR | | | |
| a-b |
20[ | 072-025 *152
20[ | KA-TE BOS 20 |
PE He 013, medallion (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 78 & 158-61).
D. 3.63 x [3.33]. Th. 0.85.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | vest. | vest. |
| b | 10[ | 10[ |
b. the number is a minimum. JGY: for the number, see Hh 016.a1, Hx 018
PE He 014, medallion(?) fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
78-79 & 158-61).
D. [2.17] x [1.95]. Th. 0.76.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | ]  | ] 041 |
| b | 20 | 20 |
JGY: for the number, see He 009, 012; Hh 016.a2+d
JGY normalizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a-b | ]
20 | ] *163 20 | ] TELA
20 |
PE He 015, medallion fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 79
& 158-61).
D. [1.23 x 0.94]. Th. [0.58].
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | vacat | |
| b | vacat | |
PE Hh 016, four-sided clay bar without suspension hole
(Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 71 & 161-65).
D. 9.03 x 2.2 x 2.3.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | X
10 |  20 |
60 | X 056-005 10 | 062-013-057-041 20 |
042-023-041 60 |
| b | X 50 | • 40 vacat | X 039-070-086 50
| •-029-049 40 vacat |
| c | X   64 | .1
vacat
.2  *• | X 011-006-092-033 64 | .1
vacat
.2
040-029-078-• |
| d | 20 vest. vacat | 025-056-005
20 vest. vacat |
Possibly the totalling document for the preliminary document Ha 003.
b. (p. 177) Compare Ha 003β. Instead of
086, 068 is possible but it is never closed at
top & bottom; to 086 there are two double
strokes at the lower exterior part and four small strokes dropping from
the upper horizontal line -- perhaps a new sign (JGY: in CHIC, 086 is hapax; 068 includes
some examples on sealstones where the top and bottom are closed [#225.a,
and especially close on #272.c]; MT & EH continue: I wonder therefore if
086 in CHIC isn't really another version of 068). Instead of •, perhaps 
046 (JGY: 046 is possible).
c. The 2nd half of c is ruled horizontally with an inscription only in
the upper zone (.2). • may be 031; numerals
are less likely (JGY: "less likely" since tens are stacked in a column,
not aligned in a
row).
c1. JGY: 033 is crammed against 092. Since the bar was written right to left, the 2nd
half begins with the inscription and ends with the vacat.
c2. JGY: while I agree with MT+EH that 031
is
preferable to 30, 30 makes better transactional sense. For
the number 30, see He
007, He 010, He
011.
JGY: the normal way to read a bar is from opposite side to
opposite side (see Homepage, "Document Types,
Bars"). If d is the last transaction, then the reading should
be a+c (which also ends abruptly) and b+d.
Transaction Document.
List 1
| a | X 10 | X 056-005
10 |
|
20 | 062-013-057-041 20 |
| 60 | 042-023-041 60 |
| c | X
64 | X 011-006-092-033 64 |
| 30 | 040-029-078 30 |
| vacat | vacat |
List 2
| b | X 50 | X 039-070-068
50 |
| 40 vacat | 046-029-049 40
vacat |
| d | 20 | 025-056-005
20 |
| vest. vacat | vest. vacat |
In list 1 (a+c) the target amount is 60 (a.3), of which
50 (20+30) has been paid leaving 10 owing ( 056-005 KU-Rv); c.1 seems to express an actual amount
64 (an actual amount that may have been needed? or perhaps a
disbursement of raw material to be worked, 60 of which are then
expected
to be returned?). In list 2 (b+d) the target
amount is implied to be 110, of which 90 (50+40) has been
paid, leaving
20 owing (TE-KU-Rv); TE
is less likely to be a commodity than, as in
the HT Linear A
documents, a transaction sign signifying "from",
i.e., origin or delivery
(cf. PE He 012). The commodity in list 1 is 
TELA (a.1, 2, possibly also in list 2). This
must be a preliminary document since so little has actually been collected
-- and the bar is not pierced, so therefore not meant for hanging, which,
if correct, would imply that only final or quasi-final documents hung from
something.
JGY: in the Petras corpus • A-TU-• appears 3 times (Tsipopoulou &
Hallager 2010, 177), probably 4 times (cf. He 011) and possibly 5 times
(cf. He 001).
| PE Ha 003.a | | 042-023-011 | A-TU-SI
|
| PE Hh 016a | | 042-023-041 | A-TU-WA |
| PE He 006.a | *
OR | 042-023
*049 orf *174 | A-TU RO3 or RE |
| PE He 011.a | | 042-023-013 | A-TU BOS |
| PE He 001.a | | 042-033-011 | A-*033-SI |
In the last (possible) occurrence, CHIC *033
may be the predecessor to Linear AB 
*047 and may
have had represented a dental phoneme (see Notes to Sign
033),
thus Tv/Dv.
All five possibilities, therefore, suggest that, at Petras, A-TU is written for
the more common
A-DE in the rest of the Hieroglyphic corpus, predecessor to 
A-DU in Linear A.
JGY normalizes
List 1
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| a.3 | 60 | 042-023 *163
60 | A-TU TELA 60 |
| a.2 |
20 | 062-013-057 *163 20 | NA-MU2-KI TELA 20 |
| a.1 | X 10 | X 056-005 10 | X KU-Rv 10 |
| c.2a | 30 | 040-029-078
30 | RO2-MA-DO
30 |
| c.2b | vacat | vacat | vacat
|
| c.1 | X
64 | X 011-006-092-033 64 | X SI2-NWA-RU-*033
64 |
List 2
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| b.1 | X
50 | X 039-070-068 50 | X PA3-RO-Rv 50 |
| b.2 | 40 vacat |
046-029-049 40 vacat | *046-MA-RO3 40 vacat |
| d | 20 | 025-056-005
20 vest. vacat | TE-KU-Rv
20 |
| or d | 20 | 056-005 *025
20 vest. vacat | KU-Rv TE
20 vest. vacat |
Transaction Summary
List 1
| TELA:
assessment | <paid> | [deficit] | actual amount?? |
| a.3: 60 | c.2a:
30
a.2:
20 | a.1: 10 | c.1: 64 |
List 2
| assessment of ?? | <paid> | [deficit] | |
| [110] | b.1: 50
b.2:
40 | d:
20 | |
PE Hh 017, four-sided clay bar (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
72-73 & 161-65). No suspension hole.
D. 6.48 x 2.0 x 1.8.
| side | inscription | transnumeration |
| a | [•] **
740 | [•]-080-057-070 740 |
| b | X [•] 3500 | X
042-[•] 3500 |
| c | vest.-[•]vest. |
vest.-[•]-vest. |
| d | vacat | |
c: • may be 078.
JGY: again, if opposite sides are read, then it should read a
with c, and b with d. If the 2nd sign on b is 
066, then it again is a divider between A and a number; see Notes
to Sign 066.
JGY: The high number 3500 should represent an assessment, to
which 2760 has been paid (side c?) and 740 is still owed
(KI-RO). The large number 3500 is somewhat similar to the largest
number in the CHIC Hiero corpus: 6400 which is given as a supernummery
number in #049 (that is, the rest of the bar concerns 1100 [[200]] and its
subdivisions; apparently #049 concerns MUL and possibly also 
• 027-•). The largest numbers in Linear A
are linked to logograms: 1060 GRA+PA (HT 102) and 3000 VAS (HT 31), also
(no logogram) 1000 (KH 81), 2000 (MA 10).
JGY: If a transaction document (below), side a clearly gives the
deficit (KI-RO 740); the large amount 3500 should be
the assessment, we would then expect 2760 to have been paid. Since
side b begins with X, that side may start the document. We would
arrange the document d+b then c+a.
Transaction Document
| b: assessment | a: [deficit] | c?: <paid>
|
3500 | •- 740 | vest.
[2760] | |
JGY normalizes
| side | inscription | transnumeration | normalization |
| d | vacat | | |
| b | X • 3500 |
X 042-• 3500 | X A-• 3500 |
| | |
| | |
| c | vest.•vest. |
vest.-•-vest. | [KU-RO 2760] |
| a | • 740 | •-080 057-070
740 | •-080 KI-RO 740 |
PE Hx 018 (ME 97/00030A), bar or label? (Tsipopoulou & Hallager
2010, 73 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ] | 10|[ | ] | 10|[ |
Two straight lines flank the numeral.
PE Hx 019 (ME 96/0665(2)E), fragment perhaps part of Ha 004, a
crescent (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 73, 86 & 165-66).
| side | impression | transnumeration |
| γ | ] • | ] • |
PE Hx 020 (ME 96/0433C), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
73, 118 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| vest. | vest. |
PE Hx 021 (ME 96/0430D), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
73, 118 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ] • [ | ] • [ |
PE Hx 022 (ME 96/1208B), fragment, undoubtedly of a crescent
(Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 73, 118 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ] • [ | ] • [ |
PE Hx 023 (ME 96/0665F), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
73, 118 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ] vest. [ | ] vest. [ |
PE Hx 024 (ME 97/Misc 3A), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager
2010, 73, 119 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ]vest.[ | ]vest.[ |
PE Hx 025 (ME 96/1145C), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
73, 119 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ]vest.[ | ]vest.[ |
PE Hx 026 (ME 97/Misc 2A), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager
2010, 73, 119 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ][ | 039 |
The sign could equally be an initial X.
PE Hx 027 (ME 97/0051F), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010,
73, 119 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| vest. | vest. |
PE Hx 028 (ME 96/Misc 4D), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager
2010, 73, 120 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ]vest.[ | ]vest.[ |
PE Hx 029 (ME 96/Misc 4D), fragment (Tsipopoulou & Hallager
2010, 73, 120 & 165-66).
| inscription | transnumeration |
| ]vest.[ | ]vest.[ |
The edge carries a seal impression: PE 054a: geometric design.
PE I 01, stopper? sealing over a vase rim? (ME 97/0052)
(Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, 115), impression from seal PE 028, perhaps a
stamp (EH says perhaps a prism)
| inscription | transnumeration |
  *• | 049-052-044-• |
044 is uncanonical in shape, but cf. CHIC
#152; an
alternative would be 042. The sign in the center
is a very deeply engraved square with a less deeply engraved triangle on
the top, perhaps 
*157 AROM as on #291.
JGY: the inscription makes better sense retrograde, with 044-049
KU-RO3 as a common version (especially on seals) of
KU-RO, "total," flanking the logogram
049 or . This kind of placement (two signs of a
disyllable signgroup flanking the logogram) is common ("monogram"); see
Notes to Signgroups VII.
JGY normalizes
| inscription | transnumeration | transcription |
| • * | • 044-049 *052
| • KU-RO3 NE |
| OR |
| • * | • 044-049 *157
| • KU-RO3 AROM
|
PE I 02 (ME 96/0742) (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, ), peg
sealing (cf. MA, CMS II.6, no. 183), impression from seal PE 010, a prism
| inscription | transnumeration | transcription |
| [ | 070 [ | RO
[ |
PE I 03 (ME 0020B) (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, ), impression
from seal PE 038, probably a prism or a diskoid
| inscription | transnumeration | transcription |
| •• | 013-•-• | MU2-•-• |
PE I 04 (ME 0025A) (Tsipopoulou & Hallager 2010, ), combination
sealing, impression from seal PE 029, a rectangular prism
